Monday, December 17, 2007

It was a bad day

Friday was a bad day in Orange County, not just because the children at our county’s two poorest schools had federal resources specifically targeted toward them suddenly taken away, but also for the premise of open and responsive local government.

Early Friday morning the Orange County Board of Education pushed through an entirely new plan for "dealing" with the disparities between Central and Hillsborough Elementary schools. After spending months coming up with a disastrous merger plan, the Board spent just about two hours coming up with the new plan.

It is amazing how quickly you can get things done when you schedule meetings when most interested parties cannot attend, and you don't feel the need to gather any community input.

Newly named Board Chairman Ted Triebel must be proud that he accomplished in two hours what Dennis Whitling couldn't get done in months - too bad for those parents and children crushed beneath the boot of Ted's efficiency.

First, and foremost, in the Board’s plan is the “redirection” of federal Title 1 funds, currently being spent on remedial reading teachers at CES and Efland-Cheeks, to the creation of a county-wide Pre-Kindergarten program at CES. This program will be open to any child in the county, but the District has no plans to provide transportation for the program. So, the only ones who will be able to attend are those who can either walk to the school or afford to drive there every morning. Wait, wasn't HES criticized for just such a situation when this whole discussion started last spring?

The true goal behind this redirection of funds, is to remove the ability of parents at either “failing school” to opt out and send their children to better performing schools. In essence, hiding the black eye of the county’s failing schools under a coat of makeup without actually doing anything to help the most vulnerable students. Not only are those children losing federal funding earmarked specifically for programs at their struggling schools, but the Board has found a way to ignore that they exist at all.

Next, all children in Kindergarten through 2nd grade at HES will be forced to reapply for their spots at the school next year. Attendance from any one school zone will be capped at 20% of that zone’s elementary school population. That means some HES children could be forced to leave the only school they have ever known. Once every Free and Reduced Lunch child who applies is admitted, the remaining spots will be awarded to other applicants based on a lottery. After all, the lottery has been such a success for funding our schools, why not use it to assign people the schools also?

The least discussed part of the plan will have the widest county-wide impact. Ted’s new plan includes one apparently innocuous bullet point aimed at helping CES meet its SES balance goals:

  • "Ensuring strict adherence to transfer policy"

What this means is that the District will rescind the ability of parents to apply for transfers from one school to another unless there is an “extreme hardship.” While that may not sound like a big change, it becomes one when you look at the number of children currently attending schools outside their zones.

As of last February, 123 elementary students were attending schools under the previous regular transfer policy, and every school in the district had both transfers in and transfers out.

I seriously doubt the parents of these 123 children ever thought they would become victims of this Board’s myopic arrogance, but I’d like to welcome them my world.

Like I said back in July, "So, if you think the current discussions about HES, CES and Efland-Cheeks don't involve you, you may be right - but probably not for long."

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

The plan itself is not that bad. I don't think what was passed was nearly as bad as other plans that were presented, such as Liz's "off with their heads" idea.

We need leadership from the Board, and Ted is incapable of providing this leadership. It's time for the Board to decide if they want to make progress with education or if they are merely going to tackle to woes of society. Their assumptions are incorrect, and its time for them to really consider what kind of community we have in Orange County.

Liz Brown is the worst excuse for a Board member. She thinks we all are stupid because we are live in the South and are not part of her Chapel Hill gang. Please remember to NEVER VOTE for LIZ BROWN at any level of government. I think she could be a great ambassador to Antartica.

Anonymous said...

I think it time for parents to exercise their right to officially complain when they believe a federal law is being violated. Check out www.ncpublicschool.org/nclb/federal/complaint . The state does have a process by which parents can complain that the Federal No Child Left Behind mandate is being violated by school staff, programs, or policies.

Here are some areas I find to be unclear:

1. The removal of federal funds from the Title I schools to be used for a county wide preschool. I know the school board says they will replace those funds but is this shuffling of federal and county monies allowed? And who is checking to see that they do replace them? Can there be a time gap between when they remove the funds and when they replace them? The school board has not provided any specific details on this process

2. I am assuming that the children who opted-out of Title I schools did so on reliance of public transportation (school buses). Doesn't the new plan, which revokes their right to transportation violate their opt-out rights? In reality it forces those children back to the schools which have only been removed from Title I status, not by improved performance, but by creation of a county-wide preschool. All of this seems at the very least to defeat the purpose of the federal law (which can be considered by a court to be illegal), if not to be an outright violation.

3. Parents districted for Efland or Central who were currently at HES when Efland and Central fell under Title I were not given information or application forms to opt out of their districted schools. Now by the new admission policy at HES they can be forced back to Efland Cheeks and Central. Again, these schools will only be moved out of Title I by creation of a county preschool, not by meeting test score guidelines. Did the county have to extend the opt out privilege to students districted for Efland Cheeks and Central even if they were currently attending a different school of choice. If so, the Board violated federal law before they even started coming up with their plan. The remedy for that error should be to let those families remain at HES.

Remember you do not need a lawyer to file a complaint. You do have to have legal standing, which means whatever you're complaining about effects or harms you in a specific way. I don't know if I have standing as my one of my children is entering 3rd grade and therefore our family can stay at HES. Certainly the parents at Efland or Central have legal standing as the removal of Title I funds for a county preschool directly affects them. Also, those families who opted out but will have to return b/c of lack of transportation have legal standing. Families removed from HES to go back to Central and Efland Cheeks have legal standing, too as they should have been given opt out rights to begin with and are being returned to schools which are artificially being lifted from from Title I status.

You also have to state in your complaint what part of the law you believe is being violated. Of course, this is tricky as the law is long and cumbersome. But it's details can be found at http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html.
If you consider the Board's acts to be violations of federal law and you care about the test scores and Title I status of these schools, you may consider it worth your time. I intend to search the law and post areas I think may address my concerns, whether I have standing or not. Perhaps, a sufficient number of complaints to this department will be enough to spark an investigation of the Board's actions and some resolution for parents.

I think the Board's concept of schools with more balanced free and reduced lunch percentages is fine. However, the complete disregard for test scores, shuffling of federal funds, and removal of services guaranteed by federal law (school transportation for opt out students)is alarming. It's time to lodge complaints with those state and federal officials charged with ensuring compliance.

Anonymous said...

Stevie,

Thank you for your informative post. I too have been wondering how the funding would really work. It seems to me that the "redirection" of funding is very suspect. We are entitled to the funding details through the Freedom of Information Act.

I too am unaffected by this new plan, however, it is a huge blow to so many children of the district that I can not ignore this flagrant action.

Tink's Mom

Anonymous said...

corrected URL
http://www.ncpublicschools.org/nclb/federal/complaint/
note "s" in publicschools

Anonymous said...

Does anyone know what will happen if CES or Efland-Cheeks don't make AYP again next year? Will the children that are forced back to these schools from HES be given the option of opting out under Title 1 and allowed back? I found the following information (link below) that by law those students should be given the option of going to another school.


HOW LONG MUST TITLE I SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT SCHOOLS OFFER TRANSFER
OPTIONS?
Title I School Improvement schools must offer public school choice UNTIL they make AYP in the
subject that first identified them for two years in a row. Public school choice must be offered in
addition to other obligations that schools must fulfill if they remain in Title I School Improvement year after year. It is possible for a school to exit Title I School Improvement in one subject in the same year that it enters for another subject. In that case, the school must continue to offer public school choice, since that is the first-year sanction.

http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/nclb/schoolchoice/facts/transferops.pdf

Anonymous said...

The academic performance at Efland-Cheeks and Central doesn't matter any more. Even if both schools fail to make AYP every year, no child will be allowed to transfer out.

The law says that only schools that receive Title 1 money are held accountable to NCLB. By stealing their Title 1 money, the Board has removed both schools from Title 1 status. Children forced back to either school will have no right to transfer out in the coming years.

Only those children who transfered out this year under Title 1 will be allowed to stay, and even then the Board has decided to take away their transportation.

Shame on you, Ted.