Charles S. Dedrick is the Superintendent of Cohoes City School District near Albany, NY.
If any Board members are interested, I've already done some research and here is his contact information:
Email cdedrick@cohoes.org - Phone: 518-237-0100 ext. 6.
A recent New York Times article profiled how Dedrick's district is using data collected to satisfy federal No Child Left Behind requirements to identify where the district is excelling and where it is lagging behind.
To do this, Cohoes employs "an increasingly popular way of analyzing test scores, called a 'growth model' because it tracks the progress of students as they move from grade to grade rather than comparing, say, this year’s fourth graders with last year’s, the traditional approach."
The growth model approach has support both from "urban educators" who feel it better measures the efforts of "poor and minority students" and from "school officials in affluent suburbs" who like the methods because "they evaluate students at all levels rather than focusing on lifting those at the bottom."
The Cohoes City School District has dubbed its growth model approach "Value Added." According to the district's website, "Value Added is a statistical method used to measure a district and school's influence on the academic growth rates of students from year-to-year. Through the program, districts examine growth data with their achievement data for a more thorough picture of their effectiveness in raising student achievement." Wow, a school district that is actually interested in tracking and raising student achievement. What a novel idea.
The NY Times article pointed out another reason why the growth model approach is gaining popularity and might draw some interest here in Orange County.
"Adding growth models as a way to satisfy federal requirements to demonstrate 'adequate yearly progress' could make it easier for some schools to avoid penalties because they would receive credit for students who improve performance but still fall below proficiency levels."
The use of growth models is being allowed by the federal government under a very limited pilot program. Only 7 states are currently allowed to employ the new approach, but lucky for us, North Carolina is one of the 7. Now all we need is a leader who understands the approach and isn't married to the old ways of doing things. Cue Mr. Dedrick.
The imminent change of Superintendents would be a great opportunity for Orange County Schools to embrace an innovative approach to measuring student performance, while also improving the District's dismal level of accountability to taxpayers for getting results.
"Cohoes school officials have spent more than $1 million on programs for their most struggling students in the past five years, and wanted to find out how much they had progressed. They learned that the lowest-level students were doing fine, while their high achievers were starting to fall behind." Does Orange County know what it is getting for its money?
"'The fact is we serve all students, and not just the lower-end students,' said Mr. Dedrick, who travels across the state to speak about growth models to school superintendents. 'If you’re just concentrating on one group of kids, it’s not fair because both sets of parents pay taxes.'"
12 comments:
This would be a good choice--if your name is Al Hartkopf. A picture says a thousand words.
Are you saying the other board members wouldn't support him because he's white? What else does the picture say?
Allan, please shut this blog down and let's try to get off to a good start this school year.
I agree with the last anonmous...This blog is just showing the very worst of HES parents. It should be shut down before anymore damage is done!
I disagree with the last few comments. I think there are some serious problems in the leadership of the Orange County School System. It is a good thing to have open dialogue regarding the issues, even if we do not always agree with what is being said. Otherwise, we have a one-sided approach and continue to go down the same ill-fated road.
We all want what is best for the children and the school system as a whole. We need to accept different ideas to be able to grow.
There are items on this blog which I don't agree with. However, the First Ammendment of our Constitution guarantees us the Freedom of Speech.
If it were "free" speech, there would be no anonymous posts, including mine.
What are you saying? We probably use "anonymous" so we can easily post our comments. Just taking a "stab" at it.
The anonymous that posted the comment on July 17 5:48 is fully correct. The Constitution does give us the freedom, anonymous or otherwise, to freely express our inner feelings.
I'm not talking about the constitution, I am talking about morals. If you are posting anonymously, then you are not speaking freely. Approx. 97% of the comments on this site are posted anonymously. It is easy to sit behind a veil and hurl out statements that are derogatory towards children, parents, teachers, principles, board members and staff of OCS and then turn around and grin in the very faces of the people that you insult. Whether you agree with Allan or not, he is upfront about his opinion, and if he's insulted or criticized anyone, at least they know where he stands. And yes, I am posting this anonymously. But at the same time, I am not putting anyone down. I am just encouraging you parents who are opposed to a merger to speak freely. And the root work in encouraging is "courage".
OMG! So posting anonymous is about "morals"? News flash: when we vote, we do not sign our names, now do we?
Let's try not to suppress our First Ammendment rights by trying to be self-righteous. I can't believe anyone would get on their high horse about posting "anonymous" and then post "anonymous" and readily admit they are doing so.
Why do we have this blog? We want to see HES extend its longevity in the way it was created: a school of choice. We are proud of our school, which, unfortunately, makes us look like elitists to some. We are fighting for what is right, maybe not what is popular.
I, too, will continue to post "anonymous". Why? None of your business.
I think you would get further by speaking at your school board meetings and bombarding them with letters and emails. Write some editorials in your local newspaper. Many of the comments on this blog weaken your argument and make it more likely that you will end up with the merger. It is probably only a handful of individuals making the comments, but they do make you all appear to be condescending. And that really hurts your case.
Phillip,
I could not agree more with you. I will let you know that we have sent numerous e-mails to our Board Members. We have met with individual Board members to discuss our views. We have spoken at the Board Meetings. The Board Members are mostly fine people, but they are under the influence of Dr. Carraway. If you have seen what she has done, you would be appalled. We know that most of our Board Members will "change their stance" come October 1st.
But anyway, thank you for posting your blog. I think our argument has been weakened by some of the postings, but have been strengthened by others.
Post a Comment